Is Craft cited in AI search answers?
Beautiful documents and notes for Apple ecosystem. This page maps Craft's likely Generative Engine Optimization footprint across the four major AI engines and identifies the highest-leverage fixes.
- Brand: Craft
- Domain: craft.do
- Category: Productivity & note-taking
- Positioning: Beautiful documents and notes for Apple ecosystem.
A full CiterLabs audit measures Craft's actual citation share across 50 priority prompts in the Productivity & note-taking category. The aggregate score is typically 10–35% for brands at this stage — meaningful gap, very remediable through a focused 60-day sprint.
Run a free GEO Score for any domain →Common GEO gaps for Productivity & note-taking brands
Craft sells in the Productivity & note-taking category. Across this category, the most common citation gaps CiterLabs sees are:
- Use-case landing pages (researchers, writers, founders) are thin.
- Comparison pages aren't structured for extraction.
- Sync, offline, and privacy claims aren't evidence-backed.
- Plugin ecosystems aren't summarized.
Prompts Craft's buyers are asking AI right now
When buyers in Productivity & note-taking categories research, they ask AI engines questions like:
- Best note-taking app for [use case]
- Notion vs Obsidian vs Roam
- Local-first note apps
- Free Notion alternative
Each of these is a citation opportunity. Craft either appears in the answer or a competitor does.
The 5 mechanism gaps that determine Craft's citation share
Whether Craft gets cited inside an AI-generated answer comes down to five mechanisms. Each of these is independently fixable in a 60-day sprint:
- Entity strength — does Craft exist as a recognizable entity in Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crunchbase, GitHub, and structured authority graphs? Brands missing from these are functionally invisible to entity-aware retrieval.
- Answer-ready content — do Craft's top pages contain passages that can be lifted intact as standalone answers (TL;DR boxes, comparison tables, Q&A blocks, definitions)? Or are answers buried in narrative prose?
- Third-party signals — do reviews, listicles, Reddit threads, and podcasts mention Craft regularly? AI engines weight these heavily.
- Schema clarity — does Craft's site declare what type of organization, what services, and what offers exist via JSON-LD schema?
- Freshness signals — are pricing, competitors, and statistics current on Craft's site? Stale pages get cited less often.
A CiterLabs GEO Sprint diagnoses all five and ships remediation in 60 days, with a +20pt citation-share lift guarantee or 100% refund.
- Notion — Connected workspace for notes, docs, and databases.
- Obsidian — Local-first knowledge base with linked notes.
- Roam Research — Networked thought tool for researchers and writers.
- Logseq — Open-source privacy-first networked notes app.
Want a real measured citation report for Craft (or your own brand)?
The free GEO Score tool measures any domain's citation share across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity in about 30 seconds. If you're Craft's team — or you compete with Craft — this is a useful baseline.